{"id":723,"date":"2026-01-14T13:48:39","date_gmt":"2026-01-14T13:48:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/2026\/01\/14\/airlines-sued-over-window-seats-fas-going-on-strike-remote-work-impact-on-hotels\/"},"modified":"2026-01-14T13:48:39","modified_gmt":"2026-01-14T13:48:39","slug":"airlines-sued-over-window-seats-fas-going-on-strike-remote-work-impact-on-hotels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/2026\/01\/14\/airlines-sued-over-window-seats-fas-going-on-strike-remote-work-impact-on-hotels\/","title":{"rendered":"Airlines Sued Over Window Seats, FAs Going on Strike?, Remote Work Impact on Hotels"},"content":{"rendered":"
Welcome to The Morning Shave for Friday, August 22, 2025. Passengers are suing airlines when there isn’t a window at their “window seat,” U.S. flight attendants may be going on strike soon, and hotels are evolving as remote workers impact demand for hotel rooms and amenities. Visit BaldThoughts.com\/tms to read all the stories. We read […]<\/p>\n
The post Airlines Sued Over Window Seats, FAs Going on Strike?, Remote Work Impact on Hotels<\/a> appeared first on BaldThoughts<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Welcome to The Morning Shave for Friday, August 22, 2025. Passengers are suing airlines when there isn’t a window at their “window seat,” U.S. flight attendants may be going on strik<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-morning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/appeal-law.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}